![\"A](\"https:\/\/realpolitikmag.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/A-Seguran\u00e7a-da-Europa-Ocidental-uma-arquitectura-Euro-Atl\u00e2ntica-multidimensional.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
RESUMO<\/p>\n
Em A Seguran\u00e7a da Europa Ocidental: uma Arquitectura Euro-Atl\u00e2ntica Multidimensional<\/em>, o autor come\u00e7a por formular a hip\u00f3tese de que a seguran\u00e7a necessita de ser alargada pelo que deve incorporar novas dimens\u00f5es e que as tarefas da seguran\u00e7a devem ser partilhadas pelo Estado com os actores n\u00e3o westfalianos, com especial incid\u00eancia nas OIG\u00b4s. Articulada com essa suposi\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e9 estabelecida a hip\u00f3-tese principal de que a arquitectura interna mais adequada \u00e0 seguran\u00e7a da Europa Ocidental \u00e9 Euro-Atl\u00e2ntica, centrada na UE e na NATO, dotada de uma concep\u00e7\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a multidimensional e assente numa base europeia supranacional ou de uni\u00e3o pol\u00edtica original; e que a arquitectura Euro-Atl\u00e2ntica se deve articular com uma arquitectura externa mundial (ONU) e regional (OSCE), no \u00e2mbito de uma seguran\u00e7a menos estatoc\u00eantrica e mais humana. Para testar hip\u00f3tese \u00e9 feita uma an\u00e1lise e avalia\u00e7\u00e3o cr\u00edtica dos contributos das diversas correntes te\u00f3ricas e das amea\u00e7as \u00e0 seguran\u00e7a no mundo do p\u00f3s-Guerra Fria, concluindo-se pela necessidade da substitui\u00e7\u00e3o do tradicional conceito unidimensional (militar) por um novo conceito multidimensional (militar, econ\u00f3mico, societal e ambiental). De seguida, continua-se a testar a hip\u00f3tese, quer atrav\u00e9s do debate te\u00f3rico entre as diversas correntes com propostas sobre a seguran\u00e7a da Europa Ocidental, quer atrav\u00e9s da an\u00e1lise das OIG\u00b4s nas quais se materializa a arquitectura interna e a arquitectura externa. E o autor conclui que a arquitectura Euro-Atl\u00e2ntica depende da arquitectura externa mundial (ONU), enquanto fonte de legitimidade do uso da for\u00e7a (dimens\u00e3o militar) e pode ser beneficiada pela arquitectura externa mundial (ONU e institui\u00e7\u00f5es especializadas) e regional (OSCE), especialmente nas dimens\u00f5es n\u00e3o militares da seguran\u00e7a. E conclui tamb\u00e9m que \u00e9 necess\u00e1rio dotar a NATO de uma concep\u00e7\u00e3o de seguran\u00e7a multidimensional, alargar a integra\u00e7\u00e3o supranacional da UE \u00e0 dimens\u00e3o militar, ou transform\u00e1-la numa uni\u00e3o pol\u00edtica original que garanta a coes\u00e3o europeia e o reequil\u00edbrio do partnership<\/em> atl\u00e2ntico e desenvolver uma zona de com\u00e9rcio livre Euro-Atl\u00e2ntica que evite que a dimens\u00e3o econ\u00f3mica abra brechas nessa arquitectura.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n ABSTRACT<\/p>\n In Western Europe\u2019s Security: a Multidimensional Euro-Atlantic Architecture <\/em>the author primarily claims that security must be broaden, i.e., it must comprise new dimensions and share its duties with the State and the non-Westphalian actors, particularly with the IGO\u2019s. In this fashion, the present study hypothesises that the most suitable internal architecture for the Western Europe\u2019 Security is a Euro-Atlantic one, focused on the EU and on the NATO. Such an architecture requires a multidimensional conception of security sustained on a supranational European basis, or else on an original political union basis. Furthermore, the Euro-Atlantic architecture must be articulated with an external world architecture (UN) and a regional one (OSCE), within the scope of a less statecentric and more human security. In order to test the hypothesis just presented, contributions provided by various theoretical approaches, as well as threats to the post-Cold War security, are both analysed and critically assessed. Therefore, one can conclude that the traditional unidimensional concept (military) must be replaced by a new, multidimensional one (military, economic, societal and environmental). Then, a range of theories with proposals concerning Western Europe\u2019Security is discussed and the IGO\u2019s (in which the internal and external architecture finds itself embodied), is analysed. Thus, one comes to the conclusion that the Euro-Atlantic architecture depends on the external world architecture (UN), as a legitimate source for the use of strength (military dimension), and it can, moreover, profit from the external world architecture (UN and specialised institutions) and regional (OSCE), specially when it comes to non-military dimensions of security. Finally and, in addition, it is necessary to provide NATO with a multidimensional conception of security and to broaden the supranational integration of the EU by adding the military dimension, or by turning it into an original political union able to guarantee the European cohesion, the reequilibrium of the Atlantic partnership and the development of the Euro-Atlantic free trade zone, which will prevent the economic dimension from ending up provoking gaps in\u00a0this architecture.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u00a9 Imagem: capa do Livro de Jos\u00e9 Pedro Teixeira Fernandes,\u00a0A Seguran\u00e7a da Europa Ocidental: uma Arquitectura Euro-Atl\u00e2ntica Multidimensional (FCG e FCT, 2002)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" RESUMO Em A Seguran\u00e7a da Europa Ocidental: uma Arquitectura Euro-Atl\u00e2ntica Multidimensional, o autor come\u00e7a por formular a hip\u00f3tese de que a seguran\u00e7a necessita de ser alargada pelo que deve incorporar novas dimens\u00f5es e que as tarefas da seguran\u00e7a devem ser partilhadas pelo Estado com os actores n\u00e3o westfalianos, com especial incid\u00eancia nas OIG\u00b4s. … <\/p>\n